IFPS PSYCHOANALYSIS
IFPS STATUTES
ESPACIO PSICOANALÍTICO
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS
RESEARCH COMMITTE
MEMBER ÁREA
SECTION OF CANDIDATES
NEWS
BLOG



IFPS proposes as it´s objective the creation and maintenance of a space permitting the production and reconstruction of psychoanalytic theory and technique, thus generating a symbolic and material space in which analysts may exchange and share ideas. Founded in 1962, IFPS was created with the objective of intensifying scientific and personal contact as well as exchanging points of view between member psychoanalytic societies through free discussions about the theory and practice of psychoanalysis and the publication of shared experiences in relation to themes related to the formation of analysts.

 The existence of the Federation is in itself of value because it is one of the international alternatives of organization and it´s stated objective is to promote a greater diversity and discussion within psychoanalytic thought, as well as to offer a different model of centralized institutional organization. The Federation is conceived of as a space for scientific exchange with pluralistic points of view that take in account the legitimacy of different psychoanalytic perspectives.

The IFPS proposes a model of institution that tries to differentiate itself from rigid criteria in the organization of the institution, attempting to get rid of bureaucratic practices whose only purpose is the “corporate defense” of the institution, which supposes a critical vision of a conception that generates hierarchic categories amongst the members. 

The IFPS, within the framework of it´s statutes, respects and values the different ways of doing things and the differences in theory and praxis of it´s member societies. These differences facilitate the comparing and exchange of ideas and practices that permit the development of psychoanalysis. We assume, therefore, that belonging to the institution is due to desire and not to a necessity to belong; the desire to share different points of view in relation to theories and clinical practice, the desire to exchange experiences with the process of “training” (transmission) and to confront new ideas with well established ones, as well as the desire for social contact and for opportunities of human contact and fraternity.  



XXI FORUM 5-8 FEBRUARY LISBON - PORTUGAL

 The International Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies holds a Forum every two years hosted by member societies, providing an opportunity for inspiring dialogue amongst an international community of psychoanalysts.

The next Forum of The International Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies (IFPS) will be hosted by:

AP – Associação Portuguesa de Psicanálise e Psicoterapia Psicanalítica
THE PSYCHOANALYTIC ENCOUNTER: CONFLICT AND CHANGE
 
We will reflect about global, relational and individual aspects of theoretical and clinical perspectives related to the psychoanalytic process.
Consider this: Two people meet twice a week at a certain hour on a certain day in a certain place - to talk.
One of them is called the Analysand and will lie on a couch. The other, whom we’ll call the Analyst, sits a little behind. There’s no eye to eye contact except (perhaps) when the Analysand arrives and leaves. The Analyst expects the Analysand to follow the basic rules of psychoanalysis as defined by Freud 100 years ago and so does the Analysand, who is supposed to be informed about them.
At first, they’ll know very little of each other, if anything at all. They’ll greet each other, lie down and seat, respectively, and start talking - or not.
What is taking place in this mysterious meeting that we call the psychoanalytical encounter?
The roles of the Analyst and of the Analysand are very different, in some basic aspects, as are for sure their expectations and stances. However, as the psychoanalytical process goes on, their encounter has to be meaningful and allow for the the growth, the expansion of the mind of the Analysand and of the Analyst. 
Sometimes the process fails and Analyst and Analysand collude into some pathological illusion, which we’ve designated by delusion. This can result from several unfortunate factors, which will certainly be discussed in our Forum.
When the process goes well – or as Bion put it “do the best with a bad result” – after a while, there won’t be in that room only two entities, but three. We can designate this other entity by many names, like the Analytical Third, for instance. The existence of this third entity is also a condition for the growth of the mind, as we see it. Another issue for fruitful discussion during our Forum.
We’d like to know your thoughts about the Psychoanalytical Encounter, which has been viewed from very different perspectives since Freud created this discipline.
What is the role of the Analyst and what can he do to facilitate the mental growth of his patient?
What is the importance of the setting? What is the importance of a timely interpretation?
What about empathy and projective identifications? What about resistances and countertransference?
As for the patient, what kind of role can he have under those special circumstances he finds himself in, struggling to be, as the poet put it, the “captain of his soul”?
And the outer reality, how does it play in this sui generis encounter of two humans, body and mind, citizens living in community? And how does this meeting, besides the qualitative change of the participants, also transform this community and the collective experience, recreating the sustainability of Polis?
Please encourage your colleagues to attend our XXI IFPS Forum in Lisboa. We look forward to our international colleagues participating along with our Portuguese colleagues.